16 Mar 2017 15:37:15
I'm going to hate myself for saying this but since I have a go quite a lot about part timers getting too many wins over current talent who work night after night I think it would be best for Reigns to beat the Undertaker. I'm a massive Taker fan but he's 50ish now and he is struggling to move and it just wouldn't make sense for him to beat Reigns. I think it would be a great way to shock the world with a dominant Reigns win and heel turn. I don't like it but it just makes sense. I don't know. What do you guys think?


1.) 16 Mar 2017
16 Mar 2017 15:52:29
By the sounds of it, it's going to happen whether we like it or not, although I suppose in a way, it doesn't mean so much now that Brock beat the streak. I already read somewhere the other day that Brock vs Roman is already being talked about for the title at next years wrestlemania :/.


2.) 16 Mar 2017
16 Mar 2017 16:04:38
Yeah I've read reports that Reigns is going over Taker, and will then be booked ridiculously strong throughout the year (like he isn't already), then WM34 he'll go over Brock to cement his place at the top of tree. Really really depressing if this happens.
Saying that I've read conflicting reports that state Vince is high on Styles and wants him on Raw where he will build the show around him and have him headline WM34 (I prefer this option)


3.) 16 Mar 2017
16 Mar 2017 21:31:36
With the comment last year by Taker that he's not going to let Wrestlemania define him. I hope he can make it to Survivor Series and retire where it all began for his character.

Anyone and everyone has a reason to cost Reigns his match against Taker. Hell he even gave HBK a reason to do it. So have someone cost him the match setting up his summer program. Taker ends his Mania career after 25 matches with just the one loss. He has a match at SS against someone like Cena that the marks will swoon over. Then he gets retired at SvS by someone like Balor or Wyatt.