22 Mar 2016 04:28:17
Bit of a spoiler (but trying not to say it)
but what an absolutely ridiculous stipulation to add to the Shane v taker match.
Surely if Shane wins, he can just "reverse" that anyway so where's the logic in that one 😂

1.) 22 Mar 2016
22 Mar 2016 12:14:39
Adding a bit of tension to the result as it was looking forgone that Shane would win.

I think the new stipulation adds an element of doubt to that.

2.) 22 Mar 2016
22 Mar 2016 14:46:11
For me it has removed all doubt with other things I have heard. I won't say anything just in case it spoils anything.

3.) 24 Mar 2016
24 Mar 2016 13:28:14
That's typical WWE logic with that stipulation. If you lose you're fired, even though I won't have the authority to fire you, as I will have just lost it because you lost the match!


4.) 24 Mar 2016
24 Mar 2016 16:17:17
Vince is in cahoots with Shane anyway obvs screwjob.