01 Feb 2017 10:45:19
I'm confused. If the rumours are true and Wyatt will win the belt at the Elimination chamber in a couple of weeks time why did they take the belt away from Styles and give it to Cena. Surely Styles would have come out better if he had lost the belt in the Chamber as the odds were against him and it seems very odd for WWE to waste Cena's record title run by making it last only 2 weeks. Then again after the rumble i've given up on trying to understand some of WWE's decisions.

1.) 01 Feb 2017
01 Feb 2017 17:13:16
If I didn't know any better I'd say the WWE have cottoned on to the rumour mill, and drip feed lots of red herrings out there.

Don't assume the rumors are true.

I am interested to see how they build a main event match out of Randy Orton?

This is what happens with two world titles, the Smackdown belt will probably be defended halfway down the card.

2.) 01 Feb 2017
01 Feb 2017 17:25:23
I can't see any other way round it. They wanted Orton to win the Rumble, Cena to get #16 before WM (because he'll be gone a while after) and I'm sure they didn't want Cena v Orton @ WM so it would have to be won and lost between the rumble and WM, leaving only the EC. I agree it makes Styles look better losing with multiple opponents but Cena v Styles smash it every time they're in the ring together so I'm happy with how it's gone.

3.) 01 Feb 2017
01 Feb 2017 18:59:29
Orton could always end up talking his shot early or lose it in a match. Especially if they don't have Wyatt win at EC.

Cena beats Orton next week, Ambrose wins the title at the Chamber, they do something with Cena, Bray, and Orton where Orton's spot is up and Cena wins it. Styles is also owed a 1on1 match for the title so they could do a no contest or dq finish that would allow him to get put in the title match.

If Rollins injury is bad enough to keep him out of Mania, there could be another change in a lot of plans.