Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded
No Avatar image uploaded
Talk Wrestling Member Posts
KRO83's Profile
KRO83's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To KRO83's Posts
To KRO83's last 5 rumours posts
To KRO83's last 5 rumour replies
KRO83's rumours posts with other poster's replies to KRO83's rumours posts
29 Aug 2014 10:05:36
I don't know if it is just me but all this talk of who is a legitimate threat to Brock had me thinking.
My thought process was as follows.
Physically who can match him or come close?
Who can match the intimidation factor/ fear factor?
Does the contender have anyone like heyman in their former?
I really can't think of many legitimate wrestlers to make it look realistic, I cannot see how Bryan has been mentioned, for me it just wouldn't work he should by all accounts be destroyed every time.
The only one I can think of at the moment is if they can save the Wyatt family then give bray a push, he ticks all the boxes for me, although I fear the wwe may have already ruined a very good product.
1.) 29 Aug 2014 16:33:18
Bryan wouldn't be that unrealistic, didn't look unrealistic when Punk took him to the limit at last years Summerslam & Bryans a much better in ring performer than Punk.
Technically I suppose the only realistic way for Brock to lose the title would be in a triple threat & not involved in the pinfall.
2.) Again I have talked about this a lot but it has to be Roman Reigns who beats Brock at Wrestlemania 31, now at the moment he does not look like a threat to Brock however this is easy to overturn, give him decisive wins over people who are perceived to be of higher quality than him. but also give him memorable wins in matches that are given the longest time and are in the semi main event at every PPV. This will culminate in a Royal Rumble win in which he breaks Kane's record for the most eliminations thus setting up a match vs Brock Lesnar at Wrestlemania by which time it will be another the immovable object in Brock Lesnar who has dominated the field of wrestlers since Summerslam vs the unstoppable force who has ploughed through the old guard and is on the rise to the top that seems like no one can stop him. wow what a build up that would be.
3.) Anyone can be made a legit threat to Brock, its play acting, if Shawn Michaels can beat up Diesel then why can't Dolf beat Brock.
The guy just needs to have the backing of the crowd, that's why for me it can only be Reigns or Bryan.
4.) 29 Aug 2014 22:53:25
Reigns already broke Kane's record at this years Rumble.
5.) Did he? oh well let's equal the record then, we never hear about this record I think the announce team could do a better job of emphasising achievements like this.
6.) 30 Aug 2014 01:03:54
I honestly cannot see how daniel Bryan can be seen as a genuine contender to Brock lesnar, even though as you say Bessex it's play acting it still needs to be believable and Bryan beating lesnar for me is not believable.
Also has anyone thought that cena could actually beat Brock in the rematch?
7.) I am sorry but both of you get in the ring with brock then tell me it's play acting!
8.) If it had to believable then Khali would never lose. The man might not move well but if he wanted he would never be pinned by anyone on the current roster - he could litetally hold peoples heads at arms length like you do with little kids.
Its Professional wrestling - anyone can beat anyone e.g. Hurriacne beat Rock, Federline beat Cena, Bret Hart beat Yokozuna
9.) 30 Aug 2014 17:24:15
C'mon Mick, you can't be serious about Khali. I would probably fancy my own chances against him, the man is practically disabled. As long as you can avoid a slow motion punch then pretty much anybody on that roster would put him out.
Yes wrestling don't have to be 100% believable but its got to be to a certain degree especially in big matches with clean finishes.
The only reason I say Bryan would be realistic somewhat is because for one he's the top guy in the company (to the fans anyway), he could out wrestle Brock in the way Angle used to. & also Bryan is probably the only wrestler in WWE that could transfer his skills over to compete in MMA (obviously at a much lower weight level to Brock).
10.) Me? I'd prefer to miss a fight with a 7 foot giant that can bench press close to 600lbs. He might be slow but if he got hold of you then you'd be buggered. Also actually landing one on that jaw would probably break your hand
11.) I wouldn't fancy knocking any WWE superstar down in reality, despite being a fairly big guy myself, Dolf is probably as big and heavy as me and damn site more athletic.
If Khali got hold of your head the rest of your body would become the tail on a kite.
Bryan could beat Brock by selling the idea of his quickness, and his strikes being deadly, after all running down the apron and smashing your knee in to a blokes face could knock out anyone no matter how big he is.
We believed he could beat Big Show and Mark Henry?
Its all about how its presented.
12.) Brock is a different animal to big show or mark Henry, no matter how it's presented or sold Bryan could and should never be able to even come close to beating him.
Kro83
13.) I don't think Bryan vs Lesnar would be a good match either, they both have their paces and I can't see bryan selling to the extent that Lesnar needs or Lesnar being susceptible to one of Bryan's fiery comebacks.
14.) Well on that we can disagree, its perfectly legitimate to say Brock is unbeatable, he certainly will build a legacy for who ever he loses to.
15.) JEPW for me that's what makes the match. Lesnar trying to slow things down and hit power moves while Bryan trys to make him blow up by quickening the pace. Worked correctly it would showcase both mens best attributes. Bryan doesn't necessarily need to win either
05 Sep 2014 18:15:53
How can someone disagree with where I am from.seriously??
Brummie
Brock is a different animal to big show or mark Henry, no matter how it's presented or sold Bryan could and should never be able to even come close to beating him.
Kro83
30 Aug 2014 01:03:54
I honestly cannot see how daniel Bryan can be seen as a genuine contender to Brock lesnar, even though as you say Bessex it's play acting it still needs to be believable and Bryan beating lesnar for me is not believable.
Also has anyone thought that cena could actually beat Brock in the rematch?